Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Time & Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Everingham, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Engendering Time

Gender equity and discourses of workplace flexibility

Christine Everingham

School of Social Sciences, University of Newcastle, Room W220 Behavioural Sciences Building, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan Campus 2308 NSW, Australia; cevering{at}hunterlink.net.au

This article explores the impact of discourses of workplace flexibility on gender equity. Time Use surveys have shown convincingly how the unequal burden of women's work in the home undermines gender equity strategies in the workplace. They have also become more sophisticated in their ability to contextualize their time measures to capture the gendered processes involved in domestic activity. However, gender equity strategies which draw on these studies are limited in the extent to which the strategies can highlight the multiplicity of timekeeping systems which order social life and the role of working mothers in coordinating these systems. Domestic life generates social time, responding to biological and communal rhythms as well as the logic of the clock. Gender equity strategies which rely on Time Use surveys based on the assumption that only one temporal logic orders social life are easily coopted by the new discourses of workplace flexibility which are foundered on the same assumption. This article argues that there are possible alternative flexibility discourses which do not depend on further de-contextualizing and de-regulating the temporal order. These are more likely to support greater gender equity if they point to the unsocial nature of a temporal order which conflates all temporality into one single logic.

Key Words: gender equity • temporality • time use • women's time • workplace flexibility

Time & Society, Vol. 11, No. 2-3, 335-351 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0961463X02011002009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Time SocietyHome page
J. Maher
Accumulating care: Mothers beyond the conflicting temporalities of caring and work
Time Society, September 1, 2009; 18(2-3): 231 - 245.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Time SocietyHome page
E. Willis, J. Henderson, L. Toffoli, and B. Walter
Gendered relations to working time and union agreements: Contradictory outcomes in acute and community nursing settings in Australia
Time Society, September 1, 2009; 18(2-3): 246 - 263.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Time SocietyHome page
J. Rubery, K. Ward, D. Grimshaw, and H. Beynon
Working Time, Industrial Relations and the Employment Relationship
Time Society, March 1, 2005; 14(1): 89 - 111.
[Abstract] [PDF]