Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Time & Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elchardus, M.
Right arrow Articles by Smits, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Persistence of the Standardized Life Cycle

Mark Elchardus

Vrije Universiteit Brussel, member of the research group TOR (tempus omnia revelat); Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium mark.elchardus{at}vub.ac.be

Wendy Smits

Vrije Universiteit Brussel, member of the research group TOR; Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium wendy.smits{at}vub.ac.be

This article investigates to what degree the standardized life cycle has been replaced by an individualized life course, characterized by the absence of a strict sequence and timing of life's transitions. In order to measure the normative position of people, rather than the external conditions to which they are subject, the test is based on the ideal life course or life cycle as described by a purely random sample of 4666 inhabitants of Belgium, aged 18 to 36. The available evidence overwhelmingly points towards the persistence of a standardized ideal life cycle, characterized by a strict sequence and timing of the important transitions.

Key Words: individualization • life cycle • open future • sequence • timing

Time & Society, Vol. 15, No. 2-3, 303-326 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0961463X06066944


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Time SocietyHome page
M. Moshe
Temporary versus Permanent: Time framing in the Israeli political arena
Time Society, March 1, 2009; 18(1): 154 - 171.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work Employment SocietyHome page
M. Elchardus and W. Smits
The vanishing flexible: ambition, self-realization and flexibility in the career perspectives of young Belgian adults
Work Employment Society, June 1, 2008; 22(2): 243 - 262.
[Abstract] [PDF]