Time & Society

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zucchermaglio, C.
Right arrow Articles by Talamo, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Time & Society, Vol. 9, No. 2-3, 205-222 (2000)

The Social Construction of Work Times: negotiated time and expected time

Cristina Zucchermaglio

'La Sapienza' University, Rome, Italy.

Alessandra Talamo

'La Sapienza' University, Rome, Italy.

This article deals with the negotiation of time boundaries in a project group. The study grew up from a theoretical approach grounded in cultural psychology, where time is considered as a cultural artifact and as a dimension of the interactive environment that could be co-constructed by all participants through discourse. The relevance of the negotiation of the temporal dimension in work settings is still unexplored. Both qualitative and quantitative data of the first meeting of a project group of an Italian national bank working on the reorganization of front-office services show how the negotiation of temporal aspects is a core topic from the very beginning of the work. This study shows that when a project starts, all participants spend a lot of effort in defining different kinds of temporal boundaries as these represent very important dimensions of work planning; time is not treated as a single topic but participants differentiate organizational time, project time, meetings time and actual meeting time. Results strengthen the hypothesis of the interactional nature of time in work settings and show specific relationships with the contents of participants' discourses.

Key Words: discourse • time • work


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organization StudiesHome page
T. Kuhn
A 'Demented Work Ethic' and a 'Lifestyle Firm': Discourse, Identity, and Workplace Time Commitments
Organization Studies, September 1, 2006; 27(9): 1339 - 1358.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Time SocietyHome page
A. Westenholz
Identity, Times and Work
Time Society, March 1, 2006; 15(1): 33 - 55.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Time SocietyHome page
F. Cooren, S. Fox, D. Robichaud, and N. Talih
Arguments for a Plurified View of the Social World: Spacing and timing as hybrid achievements
Time Society, September 1, 2005; 14(2-3): 265 - 282.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Time SocietyHome page
O. Klein
Social Perception of Time, Distance and High-Speed Transportation
Time Society, September 1, 2004; 13(2-3): 245 - 263.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Time SocietyHome page
S. Waterworth
Temporal Reference Frameworks and Nurses' Work Organization
Time Society, March 1, 2003; 12(1): 41 - 54.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Time SocietyHome page
O.-H. Ylijoki and H. Mantyla
Conflicting Time Perspectives in Academic Work
Time Society, March 1, 2003; 12(1): 55 - 78.
[Abstract] [PDF]